Building Codes Vote Marred by ‘Zombie Proposals’ Could Impact Housing Affordability

Filed in Codes and Standards by on February 4, 2020 5 Comments

insulationFor most of 2019, the International Code Council’s 2021 building codes cycle was moving along as expected. But a last-minute wave of newly-registered voters appears to have derailed the online vote in what appears to be a concerted effort to impact the code development process.

NAHB was heavily involved at all stages in the current code development cycle, which includes changes to the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and the all-important International Residential Code (IRC) for the 2021 edition of the I-Codes. NAHB members and staff had a significant presence at both the ICC Committee Action Hearings in Albuquerque last May and the Public Comment Hearings in Las Vegas in October.

Through the deliberative and transparent hearing process established by the ICC, NAHB — along with a host of other advocates and stakeholders along all ideological lines — publicly influenced many proposals with testimony backed by data and relevant research.

When the vote results came in from the ICC’s Online Governmental Consensus Vote, held Nov. 19 through Dec. 6, 2019, it was as expected, with a success rate of around 84% on non-energy code proposals that NAHB either supported or opposed, in line with results from previous years. But when the preliminary results on the IECC were reported, there were some surprising discrepancies.

Many aggressive energy efficiency proposals that had been defeated at both the committee hearings and the public comment hearings had been approved by the online vote (preliminary results). When proposals are defeated at hearings, they must get a two-thirds majority to overturn past results. It’s a bar so high, no previous proposal had ever met the threshold. But in this code cycle, 20 IECC “zombie” proposals cleared the hurdle and came back to life. And some will negatively impact housing affordability for home builders and buyers.

The more egregious changes include:

  • Gas water heaters, stoves and dryers need to be “electric ready,” with appropriate receptacles installed nearby if a home owner decides to switch to all-electric appliances
  • An electric vehicle charging receptacle (40A 220V) needs to be installed in all single-family homes with a parking space
  • Wall insulation was increased to R-20+5 in climate zones 4 and 5
  • Ceiling insulation was increased to R-60 in climate zones 4 through 8
  • Ceiling insulation was increased to R-49 in climate zones 2 and 3

A preliminary NAHB analysis of the changes pegs the cost impact to be a low-end estimate of $2,400-$7,200 in climate zone 1, to a high-end estimate of $5,000-$14,000 in climate zones 4 and 5, for each new single-family home of average size.

With such inconsistent results, NAHB suspected that something was amiss with the voting. After reviewing the approved governmental voters, it was discovered that hundreds of new government employees from towns all over the country were validated to vote — and they voted in droves.

There was a concerted effort on the part of efficiency and environmental groups to engage like-minded governmental members who work in environmental, sustainability and resilience departments. These new voters appear to have worked off the same voting guide and simply voted their party line.

NAHB will be very actively pushing back on these zombie proposals. First, staff is appealing at least two of the results that they believe are related to proposals that are out of scope for the energy code. Also, NAHB will be challenging the voting credentials of a number of new members.

NAHB also intends to work with ICC to tighten up voting eligibility and modify the process to limit or eliminate proposals from getting approved that lose the first two hearings.

For now, read the results and know that NAHB is doing all it can to stand up for reasonable building codes that help build safe housing that is affordable.

For more information on the vote or the codes development process, contact Craig Drumheller.

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. John Bitely says:

    Please keep fighting for us builders……. the public knows not what is going on nor do they care “right now” but they also can’t afford these changes…….

  2. This is bigger than a fight for builders alone. It is a fight to bring affordability back to housing by stopping activist groups from using government regulation to force their radical agendas into the codes. Let them market their ideas and win converts who want to spend their own money, voluntarily, for the building systems they want. For the rest of the consumers, builders will continue to construct the homes they want and can afford.

  3. John Hills says:

    As always the so called environmental lobby is out of control. I have yet to meet a customer/client who wishes to pay for these “extras”. Keep fighting for contractors. Hopefully common sense will win out.

  4. we need everyone to contact our representatives

  5. Arn McIntyre says:

    There is legislation in the House and Senate committees currently. It is expected that these bills will enter final markup soon. This legislation inserts the DOE into the process to set the target energy standards for ICC and if the targets are not met then the DOE is to provide specific proposals to meet the standards. The DOE is then given the responsibility to monitor the states to ensure code enforcement. It is claimed that that these new codes will be voluntary for the states to adopt however millions of dollars of federal funding to the state is tied to the enforcement of the codes. I just testified on this matter with all of the other witness’ fully in favor. The claims of cost and payback by the other support groups are beyond remotely realistic. It is getting time for everyone to contact their Representatives and Senators.

Leave a Reply to Bill Gschwind Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *