Rising Lumber Prices Hit Home

Filed in Codes and Regulations by on April 13, 2018 17 Comments

A tariff on Canadian cedar shingles means cost increases at Duxbury Woods, an active-adult community in Massachusetts.

John C. “Jack” Dawley got an unwelcome surprise recently when he opened an email from the company that supplies the white cedar shingles for the homes in an active-adult development he’s building in New England.

The shingles are imported from Canada, and as of March 14 are subject to an immediate 20.8% duty that the U.S. imposed as part of its ongoing softwood lumber trade dispute.

That translated into an additional cost of $1,400 per unit for the 12 homes planned for the next phase of construction – and half had already been sold.

“For most people, including me, the topic of tariffs and their impact is abstract,” said Dawley, president and CEO of Northland Residential Corp., a builder-developer focused on high-end single-family and condo communities in eastern Massachusetts. “It was instantly clarified with this message.”

Coniferous shingle and shake products had not previously been subject to tariffs because there is so little production in the United States and thus not competing with similar American products. Further, there had been no accusations of improper conduct levied against Canadian shake and shingle manufacturers, his supplier explained.

“What Americans and our administration need to understand is that, at a minimum, a third of the U.S. supply of dimensional framing lumber and 100% of red and white cedar shingles come from Canada,” Dawley said.

“The simple fact is that U.S. simply does not produce what it consumes, and its economy relies on the rational importation of certain goods. In the case of home building, taxing such goods via a tariff simply drives up the cost of production,” he said.

The prices on softwood lumber imports skyrocketed after the 2017 hurricane season and were up 30% from the four months leading to January 2018. By April 6, the Random Lengths Framing Lumber Composite price hit $492, up from $414 a year earlier.

A study by NAHB economists shows that the increase in the cost of lumber since the beginning of 2017 has been enough to drive up the price of an average new single-family home by $6,388, and the market value of an average new multifamily housing unit by $2,430.

The study also shows that while they were designed to boost employment in the U.S., the tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber will instead result in the net loss of 9,370 jobs in 2018.

While there is an expected increase of 1,193 jobs in U.S. sawmills, there is an expected loss of 10,563 jobs in all other industries because there are millions more jobs that depend on lumber than there are jobs in domestic lumber production. In other words, nearly nine jobs will be lost in other U.S. industries for every job gained in domestic sawmills as a result of these tariffs.

NAHB CEO Jerry Howard met with Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross last month and urged him to work with his Canadian counterparts to reach a long-term solution to the trade dispute that is equitable to both sides.

And when NAHB members meet with their federal representatives and senators as part of the Bringing Housing Home initiative April 30-May 5, lumber will be an important talking point: Members will ask Congress to urge the administration to return to the table and negotiate a new agreement – and also consider ways to increase the domestic supply of timber from public lands.

“Operating a business with this level of production price uncertainty takes almost constant vigilance,” Dawley said. “My fear is that it will take years to unravel this misplaced and inappropriate tariff, and only after real harm has been done to housing affordability and our economy.”


Tags: , ,

Comments (17)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Raymond Luther says:

    The Canadian manufacture should eat that cost.

    • David Koster says:

      That’s not really how a market works. If there were American manufacturers the Canadians would likely eat much of that cost – or cheapen the product somehow. But there isn’t a domestic source so the US builder and consumer can take it or leave it.

      The builder can change the architecture, but regional consumers might not buy it so someone in the U.S. eats a cost increase for no good reason.

  2. Bif says:

    That’s only $116 per home. Comes to a few cents on homeowner’s monthly payment?

    • Bif says:

      my bad- article reads 1400 per unit. Less than $4 per month on the mortgage

      • Christine Hethcock says:

        The article says the price increase per average home is $6,388 and that is a lot of money. The 20% tariff is really hurting all Americans and needs to be lifted.

  3. David Koster says:

    Yes it is only a few dollars per month – for that one item. I build in the South and we don’t use much of the product highlighted in the article so that has no direct impact on me. But my lumber related costs per home is up almost $7,000 per home since the tariffs were introduced. Our average home size is about 2,000 s.f. and we are having a problem getting the appraisals to cover that $3+ per s.f. cost. I’m losing sales or eating that cost on every build.

  4. Go MODULAR!
    Hard to compete with large factory builders buying lumber in bulk. I love Modular!
    Innovative, system built housing is the smarter way to build.

  5. TP says:

    Just another example of how we are MAGA.

  6. Doc says:

    How do they calculate the 10,563 job loss. I have been in the building business for almost 50 years. Many times with this kind of thing everybody in the U.S. part of the industry also added an increase of their own and blame it on the tariff. The
    tariff gives U.S. mills the opportunity to make more money, increase their production, and hire more people. I realize the greater amount of timber is in Canada, but we have a substantial amount of timber here ( with harvesting control ) but restricted by the government for harvesting.

  7. Todd says:

    If the Canadian Dollar was at par with the US Dollar, there would not need to be any tariffs. The Canadian government manipulates their dollar by 20 to 35% and these duties just even the playing field. Funny how we cannot sell US produced lumber products into Canada almost solely due to the exchange rate at the border.

  8. Scott Wade says:

    This article fails to link why and what kind of jobs are lost due to lumber increases. I don’t disagree with the logic, however to just state that and not give me examples is poor reporting. I have Trouble with this type of reporting. The rising cost of materials has been a concern since I started building 30 years ago.

  9. Norman Hyman says:

    Mr Trump’s interested in big buildings. Affordable housing is irrelevant to him.

  10. Mike says:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the tariff revenues go to the government of the USA?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *