NAHB Chair Details Legal Challenge to OSHA Rule

pencilNAHB has joined several other industry groups to file a challenge against the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Department of Labor regarding OSHA’s final Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses rule, which NAHB Chairman Ed Brady called “unlawful and arbitrary” in a press statement issued Thursday.

“We have vigorously opposed this rule from the start, and cannot allow this type of regulatory overreach to occur,” Brady said.

“There are significant concerns associated with OSHA’s requirement of employers to submit detailed injury and illness logs to the agency for public posting. Not only does OSHA not have the authority to do this, it also exposes a business to significant reputational harm, all without demonstrating any evidence that it would effectively reduce workplace injuries and illnesses,” he said.

“We also have serious concerns about the anti-retaliation portion of the rule, which would allow OSHA inspectors to cite an employer without needing a complaint from a worker. This is a clear overreach of authority, as it goes against Congress’s carefully constructed mechanism to address retaliation that is specifically set forth in the OSHA statute.

“OSHA has not justified any of the rule’s requirements with any real benefits analysis and has relied entirely on anecdotal information. This is entirely insufficient and cannot be allowed to stand and potentially serve as a precedent for other agency rules. Workplace safety is of the utmost concern of our members, however this rule is unlawful and does not serve its intended purpose of improving workplace safety. The rule needs to be vacated and set aside in its entirety,” Brady said.

For information about jobsite safety, contact NAHB’s Rob Matuga at 800-368-5242 x8507.

Tags: ,

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Eric Meyers says:

    While I am a sole proprietor, who works alone, therefore this rule would not apply to me, none the less this is just another exzmple of the general over reach that many agencies are trying to put in place. Thanks for bringing this regulatory point to the public view. I strongly oppose any such ruling as unnecessary. Having worked on several very large jobs in past years and having been exposed to the injury reporting process I feel that it is already a bit more than is actually needed, and cumbersome. Yes oversight is good, however that oversight should serve the industries affected more than the lawyers circling a job site looking for blood.

  2. Don Druse says:

    You may want to check the new ruling as it states any amputation or loss of an eye, is reportable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement